Skip to tool
Yellowstone Local · Client hiring toolkit

Trades interview scorecard

Use a consistent conversation to understand how each candidate does the work. Record the answer, apply the agreed anchors and keep unanswered questions visible.

Before, during and after interviewsFill it in here. Print a copy when you’re ready.

How to use this tool

  1. Before interviews, confirm the role’s must-haves and agree which criteria, questions and rating anchors fit that role. Adapt the examples before using them.
  2. Ask candidates for the same role the same core questions consistently. Use follow-up probes to clarify their own actions and the result.
  3. Record job-related evidence. Mark Not observed when the conversation did not establish the evidence; do not treat a missing answer as a score of zero.
  4. Each interviewer records ratings independently before group discussion. Use the discussion to resolve evidence gaps and agree a next step.
  5. This scorecard does not calculate a recommendation, rank candidates or automatically disqualify anyone. The hiring team owns the decision and any verification.
Download blank PDF

Blank tool. Enter your own details or explore the fictional example.

Average of observed criteriaNot yet rated

0 of 5 criteria observed

No observed criterion is missing an evidence note.

No passing score, candidate ranking, or automatic hiring decision is applied.

01 / Set up the interview

Keep completed candidate notes in your approved hiring system.

Copy the job-related essentials from the approved hiring brief. Do not add new criteria after meeting a candidate.

02 / Five job-related conversations

Use 1, 3 and 5 as behavior anchors; 2 and 4 sit between the adjacent anchors. Leave the rating blank until assessed. Use Not observed when evidence is missing. No total or passing score is defined.

Technical experience

Tell me about a recent task similar to this role. What was your responsibility, what steps did you take and how did you confirm the work was complete?

  • Which parts did you personally complete?
  • What was outside your scope?
  • What did you check before handing the work over?
1 / Limited evidenceGives little relevant detail or cannot explain their own steps and completion checks.
3 / Relevant evidenceDescribes relevant work, their own responsibilities, a logical process and basic completion checks.
5 / Strong evidenceExplains relevant, challenging work clearly; connects choices to findings, recognizes scope limits and describes thorough verification and handoff.
Problem solving

Describe a job where the first explanation for a problem turned out to be wrong. How did you work out what to do next?

  • What information changed your thinking?
  • What alternatives did you consider?
  • When did you involve someone else?
1 / Limited evidenceJumps to a fix without a clear account of gathering information or checking assumptions.
3 / Relevant evidenceExplains a practical sequence of checks, uses the findings and adjusts the approach when needed.
5 / Strong evidenceCompares plausible causes, explains why evidence changed the plan, involves appropriate help and confirms that the underlying issue was addressed.
Safe-work judgment

Tell me about a time you paused or changed a job because it could not be done safely as planned. What did you notice and what happened next?

  • What was the risk?
  • Who did you involve?
  • How did you establish that it was appropriate to continue?
1 / Limited evidenceDoes not identify a relevant risk or describes proceeding without resolving a recognized concern.
3 / Relevant evidenceIdentifies the concern, pauses or changes the work, follows the applicable company process and involves the right person.
5 / Strong evidenceExplains how they recognized the risk, protected others, checked authorization or training limits and confirmed the conditions for safe continuation.
Work quality & ownership

Tell me about a job you checked before handing it over. What did you look for, what did you correct and what did you document?

  • How did you know the result met the expectation?
  • Was anything still unresolved?
  • What did the next person need to know?
1 / Limited evidenceCannot describe a meaningful completion check or how unresolved work was communicated.
3 / Relevant evidenceDescribes appropriate checks, corrects identified issues and records the result and any next steps.
5 / Strong evidenceSets clear completion criteria, catches issues before handoff, verifies corrections and leaves documentation that helps the next person avoid repeat work.
Customer & team communication

Describe a time you had to explain a problem or a change in plan to a customer or teammate. How did you make sure they understood the next step?

  • What did you say in plain language?
  • How did you handle an expectation you could not promise?
  • How did you confirm the handoff?
1 / Limited evidenceGives an unclear account or cannot explain how the other person learned what would happen next.
3 / Relevant evidenceExplains the issue clearly, sets realistic expectations and confirms the next action and owner.
5 / Strong evidenceAdapts the explanation to the audience, checks understanding, handles uncertainty honestly and follows through with a clear, accurate handoff.

03 / Check what still needs verification

An interview answer is not independent verification of a credential. This records the reviewer’s assessment; it does not trigger a decision.

For each must-have, note Yes, No or Needs verification with the evidence, follow-up owner and any pending check.

04 / Make the next step clear

A human decision, with reasons. No score threshold is applied.

Point to evidence and requirements, rather than an overall impression or personal similarity.

An internally agreed planning date, not a service commitment.

Review before you use it

Sources & approach

Original Yellowstone Local worksheets informed by the sources below. Adapt each tool to the role and your company’s processes; the sources do not endorse Yellowstone Local.

Sources reviewed 2026-10-29. This planning tool is adapted for your company’s use; it does not submit a hiring request.